Annotation of imach/html/doc/docmortweb.tex, revision 1.4
1.1 brouard 1: % -*-Latex-*-
1.4 ! lievre 2: % $Id: docmortweb.tex,v 1.3 2004/08/02 11:43:33 lievre Exp $
1.1 brouard 3: %\documentstyle[11pt,epsf,a4]{article}
4: \documentclass[12pt,oneside]{article}
5: \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
6: \usepackage{mathmacr,amsmath} %\usepackage{english}
7: \usepackage[francais]{babel} %\selectlanguage{francais}
8: \usepackage{graphicx,a4,indentfirst,latexsym,color}
9: \usepackage[cyr]{aeguill}
10: \usepackage{vmargin}
11: \usepackage{amsmath}
12: %\usepackage{times}
13: %\usepackage{shorttoc}
14: %\pagestyle{empty}
15: %\pagestyle{headings}
16: %\setmarginsrb{3cm}{1.7cm}{2.5cm}{3cm}{0cm}{2cm}{1cm}{1cm}
17: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.5}
18: %\usepackage{fancyheadings}
19: %\pagestyle{headings}
1.4 ! lievre 20: \interfootnotelinepenalty=10000
1.1 brouard 21:
22: %\rfoot{\leftmark\\\rightmark}
23: %\cfoot{}
24: \begin{document}
25: %\maketitle
26:
27: \makeatletter
28: \renewcommand{\@biblabel}[1]{}
29: \makeatother
30: \bibliographystyle{apalike}
31:
32: \section*{Estimation of the force of mortality -independently of the
33: initial health state- from cross-longitudinal surveys using IMaCh
34: version 0.97}
35:
36: \newcommand{\thetah}{{\hat{\theta}}}
37: \newcommand{\thetat}{{\underset{\tilde{~}}{\theta}}}
38: \newcommand{\thetaht}{{\hat{\underset{\tilde{~}}{\theta}}}}
39:
40:
41:
42:
43:
44: The starting point (origin of time) of the duration of survival of
45: each individual is the date of entry in the study, i.e. its age at the
46: date of the first wave. The time of survival is measured until the
1.2 brouard 47: date of the death if the subject dies before the last interview
1.1 brouard 48: or until the age at the last interview if the subject is still alive.
49: The models classically used in analysis of the biographies consider
50: only the duration of survival and suppose that all the individuals are
51: interviewed at the same time. Because of the great disparities of the
52: ages at the first wave, it is mandatory to take into account the age
53: in the model of analysis of survival. The estimated parameters are
54: calculated with the method of the maximum of probability.
55:
56:
57: Let be $x_i$ the age at the first interview of individual $i$, $x_i^d$ is the
58: age at death, $x_i^c$ is the age at the last interview and
59: $\delta_i$ a dummy variable indicating the status ($\delta_i$=0 if
60: the individual is dead and 1 otherwise).
61:
62: If the subject is dead, its contribution to the likelihood is the
63: product of the survival probability between age $x_i$ and $x_i^d$ by
64: the probability of dying between age $x_i^d$ and $x_i^d+1$. This
65: contribution is
66: \begin{eqnarray}
67: \mu (x_i^d)\exp\left(-\int_{x_i}^{x_i^d}\mu(u)du\right).
68: \end{eqnarray}
69:
70: The contribution of a surviving suject to the date of the last wave is the
71: survival probability between age $x_i$ and $x_i^c$, i.e.
72: \begin{eqnarray}
73: \exp\left(-\int_{x_i}^{x_i^c}\mu(u)du\right).
74: \end{eqnarray}
75:
76:
77: \bigskip The total likelihood $L$ of $n$ independant sujects,
78: indexed by $i$, is the product of the contributions of each individuals:
79: \begin{eqnarray}
80: L = \Pi_{i=1}^{n} \left[\mu
81: (x_i^d)\exp\left(-\int_{x_i}^{x_i^d}\mu(u)du\right)\right]^{(1-\delta_i)}\left[\exp\left(-\int_{x_i}^{x_i^c}\mu(u)du\right)\right]^{(\delta_i)}
82: \end{eqnarray}
83: where $\mu(x)$ is the force of mortality at age $x$. By definition,
84: $\mu(x)dx$ is the probability for an individual aged $x$ to die
85: between ages $x$ and $x+dx$.
86:
87: \bigskip The log-likelihood is then
88: \begin{eqnarray}
89: \label{e:loglik}
90: l =
91: \sum_{i=1}^{n}(1-\delta_i)\left[\left(-\int_{x_i}^{x_i^d}\mu(u)du\right)
92: +\log(\mu(x_i^d))\right]+\delta_i\left[-\int_{x_i}^{x_i^c}\mu(u)du\right]
93: \end{eqnarray}
94:
95: \bigskip
96:
97: Suppose that the force of mortality is modelled by a Gompertz law
98: where the two parameters are $\mu_{100}$ and $\theta_1$. The force of
99: mortality is $\mu(x) = \mu_{100} \exp(\theta_1 (x-100))$. The
100: parameter $\mu_{100}$ is the force at age 100 ans and $\theta_1$ is
101: the slope.
102:
103: \bigskip Then the log-likelihood is
104: \begin{eqnarray}
105: \label{e:llgompertz}
106: l(\mu_{100},\theta_1) &=& \sum (1-\delta_i) \left[ - \frac{\mu_{100}}{\theta1}
107: \left( \exp(\theta_1x_i^d)-\exp(\theta_1x_i)\right)
108: + \log(\mu_{100}) + \theta_1(x_i^d) \right] \nonumber\\
109: &&
110: + \delta_i \left[ - \frac{\mu_{100}}{\theta1} \left( \exp(\theta_1x_i^c)
111: -\exp(\theta_1x_i)\right)\right]
112: \end{eqnarray}
113:
114:
115:
116: \bigskip The usual software of statistics cannot be employed to
117: implement this parametric model because their procedures making it
118: possible to carry out biographical analyses do not take into account
119: the age. All the estimates and the construction of the confidence
120: intervals were carried out with a program written in language C. We
121: used a function of maximization based on the algorithm of Powell
122: describes in the book { \em Numerical Recipes in C }
123: (1992). The matrix of covariance is calculated
124: like the reverse of the matrix hessienne to the optimum.
125:
126:
127:
128:
129:
130:
131: \end{document}
132:
133:
134:
135:
136:
137:
138:
139:
140:
FreeBSD-CVSweb <freebsd-cvsweb@FreeBSD.org>